Legal Opinion
Pittman v. Lilly
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 3, 1941No. 36092PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Justice.
George E. Lilly (defendant-appellee), whose property was seized under a writ of attachment issued pursuant to the petition of Theodore A. Pittman (plaintiff-appellant), wherein it was alleged that defendant, who was a nonresident of this state, being a resident of the County of Harris, State of Texas, was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $6,051.1'5, moved to dissolve the writ of attachment on the ground that he was a bona fide resident of the State of Louisiana. After hearing the evidence on the trial of the motion the trial judge dissolved the writ of attachment, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hyde v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Paramount Wood Products Co. v. Colonial Fire UnderwritersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Stanford v. BischoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Irish Levy Electric Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Swift & Co. v. Leon Cahn & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guillory v. Reimers-Schneider CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Blaize v. CazezuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Lor, Inc. v. Martin Exploration Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Carpenter v. CarpenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.