Legal Opinion

Second Municipality v. Corning

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

from the Third District Court of New Orleans, Kennedy, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court (Slidell, J. dissenting as to the question of jurisdiction,) was pronounced by

Eustis, C. J.

The defendants, Corning and John Egerton, are sued for the sum of four hundred dollars, under the allegation that the firm of Corning & Co. of which they are members, is liable to the tax imposed by the general council on bankers, or persons buying and selling bills of exchange, as their principal business in New Orleans. The defendants admitted the liability of the partnership to the tax, wrhich was two hundred dollars, and tendered that amount, which was paid into court. The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. State ex rel. Fitzpatrick-Cromwell Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Town of Minden v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Beugnot v. TremouletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  5. Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API