Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Deschenes
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 18, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Maureen Deschenes, Personal Representative of the Estate of James Leo Deschenes (“Leo”), appeals from the judgment of the Oxford County Probate Court {Hanley, J.) holding that prior to his death Leo Deschenes legally transferred to Paul and Charles Deschenes by deeds the right, title, and interest to his Shapleigh, Maine, property. Maureen contends that the court erred in finding delivery of the deeds. Paul cross appeals from the court’s denial of his motion, pursuant to 18-A M.R.S.A. § 1-601(1998), 1 to allow Leo’s es tate to pay his costs, including attorney fees. We affirm both…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stickney v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Largay v. LargaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Gatchell v. GatchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
- Waxler v. WaxlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Morin v. DuboisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. WeinschenkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Estate of MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Wells v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Dalton v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
- In Re Estate of MarquisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.