Legal Opinion

Morin v. Dubois

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 25, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

[¶ 1] Adrien Morin appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Archibald, A.R.J.) denying his request for relief pursuant to the Maine Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 3571-3582 (Supp.1997). On appeal he contends that the court erred in finding that Paul Dubois, Dana’s father, did not make certain transfers with the actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud his creditors and that the transfers were not fraudulent pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 3575(1)(B)(2) and § 3576(1). We agree and vacate the judgment.

[¶ 2] The following facts are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glidden v. BeldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. ProiaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  3. Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Michaud v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. In Re Estate of DeschenesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Development Specialists, Inc. v. KaplanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2017
  4. Carneal v. LeightonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
  5. ATHR, Inc. v. NoltDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API