Legal Opinion
State v. Weinschenk
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 15, 2005PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent: CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.
ALEXANDER, J.
[¶ 1] Frederic D. Weinschenk and Ric Weinschenk Builders, Inc. (RWB) appeal from a judgment and order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) finding that they violated the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 207, 209 (2002), by engaging in a pattern or practice of unfair or deceptive acts by (1) selling defective houses that did not comply with generally accepted construction practices, and (2) misrepresenting to consumers the quality of the construction of the houses. Weinschenk and RWB contend that the court erred in:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wm. Passalacqua Builders, Inc. v. Resnick Developers South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Bartner v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Doll v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Advanced Construction Corp. v. PileckiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Pettinelli v. YostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.