Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Town of Morristown

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 22, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, S. C. C.

Defendants, separately, move to strike the complaint filed in this suit on the ground that it does not state a cause of action against either of them, involving as it does a municipality and a public corporate body.

The factual narrative in the complaint appears to be that on August 28th, 1934, the town of Morristown was the owner of certain property adjoining Mills street, known as Lacej' *289Field and used as a part of the town’s park system, which field is adjacent to Memorial Field, the property of the defendant board of education; that the only method of ingress and egress…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allas v. Borough of RumsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. Olesiewicz v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  4. Liming v. HolmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Chatman v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Satink v. Holland Tp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
  4. Falcone v. Board of EducationNew York County Court, Essex County · 1939
  5. Weeks v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API