Legal Opinion

Liming v. Holman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 26, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, S. C. C.

This is a motion to strike an original and an amended complaint, as filed in this suit, on the general ground that in neither aspect does it set forth a cause of action. Since I conclude that this is so, it is not found necessary to consider the question also raised as to the improper designation of certain of the defendants as individuals rather than the corporate body sought to be involved by proper legal title, of which they are said to have been members at the time of the incident which gives rise to the action.

Briefly summarized, it may be said that the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
  2. Wild v. Mayor of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
  3. Buckalew v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  4. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. KaiserSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  5. Johnson v. Board of Ed., WildwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Gurley v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API