Legal Opinion

Carter v. Hoblit

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1988No. S-1801PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of D.P. Hoblit. We conclude that there are genuine issues of material fact and reverse.

FACTS1

James E. Carter, Sr., Edward B. Smalley, and D.P. Hoblit agreed in 1948 to purchase land owned by D.D. and Myrtle Clover. The purchase price was $750 which Hoblit agreed to pay with the understanding that he would be promptly reimbursed by Carter and Smalley. Title was to be taken in the names of the three purchasers. Hoblit bought the property from the Clovers on March 23, 1948, but took the deed in his name alone. Carter and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ray v. WinterIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API