Legal Opinion

State v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1911No. 16,535PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original action by the state. Demurrer to petition.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

This is an original action in this court, begun in the name of the state by the attorney general upon the application of the state railway commission. The petition alleges that defendant is a corporation authorized to do business in this state, and that the business which it .is authorized to do “is the building and' operation of public highways in said state for the carriage and transportation of persons and property within and through, and in and *670out of, said state for hire and profit; that defendant has been for many years last past, and now is, operating about 2,000 miles of railroad in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Columbian Athletic Club v. State ex rel. McMahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Vance v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. State v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. McShane v. CannonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Ak-Sar-Ben Exposition Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. FraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. State v. MaltbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API