Legal Opinion
King v. Titsworth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 4, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0387PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Keith and Stacy King (hereinafter the “Kings”) appeal the superior court’s final judgment in their contract action against Ralph Titsworth (“Titsworth”). The Kings raise four issues on appeal. In this opinion, we only address the issue relating to attorneys’ fees, and we vacate the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees in favor of Titsworth. We address the remaining issues in a separate memorandum decision filed this date pursuant to Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 28(g), and we affirm the trial court's judgment with respect to those issues.
I
¶ 2…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Powell v. WashburnArizona Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. IRWIN EX REL. COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Balestrieri v. BalestrieriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Halt v. GamaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.