Legal Opinion

Halt v. Gama

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 2015No. 1 CA-SA 15-0223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWE, Judge:

¶ 1 Robert and Lynn Halt seek special action relief from the trial court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees entered on remand pursuant to this Court’s memorandum decision and resulting mandate in Halt v. Sunburst Farms East, Inc., 1 CA-CV 12-0376, 2014 WL 173639 (App.2014), in favor of Sunburst Farms East, Inc., Kenneth Braden, and David Haney (collectively, “Sunburst”). As relevant to our disposition of this special action, the Halts argue that Sunburst waived its claim for pre-appeal attorneys’ fees because it failed to request those fees in its appeal briefing or before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dcs v. Hon. duncan/juan P., S.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API