Legal Opinion

Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 25, 1992No. 90D-300490; CA A70518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this action for breach of contract against defendant utility for failure to provide adequate service required by statute, plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. In a related matter, plaintiffs attorney, Magar, appeals from two judgments against him for contempt of court that imposed fines of $50 and $100, respectively.

On plaintiffs appeal, her brief fails to set out verbatim the relevant, or any, portion of the record relating to her first assignment. We will not consider it. ORAP 5.45(4). What appears to be a second assignment of error is not separately set out, also in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frogge v. U S West Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API