Krueger v. Krueger
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Gregory Krueger appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to enforce visitation, and from the court’s subsequent order increasing his child support obligation.1 We affirm the denial of Krueger’s motion, concluding the March 2009 order remains in effect and currently restricts full visitation. We reverse the order increasing Krueger’s child support obligation, because the district court did not make independent, specific findings regarding his net income, and remand for these findings to be made.
I
[¶ 2] Gregory Krueger and Deborah Krueger, now known as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Schmidt v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Deyle v. DeyleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Conzemius v. ConzemiusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Carroll v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Dick v. ErmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Langwald v. LangwaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.