Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Carroll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2017No. 20160190PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Carroll appealed from an order denying his motion to set aside or vacate the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, after the court entered a divorce judgment awarding Anna Carroll monthly child support of $1,387. We conclude the district court did not err in denying a continuance of the trial or in allowing the State be named a real party in interest. We conclude, however, the district court abused its discretion in denying his motions when it made insufficient findings to support its award of child support. We reverse and remand.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kopp v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Korynta v. KoryntaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schrodt v. SchrodtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Rath v. RathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Riddle v. RiddleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Condon v. St. Alexius Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API