Legal Opinion
Leemreis v. Sherman Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 2007No. Docket Nos. 261887, 263667, 263808PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals, Sherman Township appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition and a subsequent order awarding costs and attorney fees to Joseph A. Leemreis and Lori M. Leemreis. The Leem-reises appeal as of right, contending that the trial court should have awarded them more costs and attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and vacate the trial court’s order awarding costs and attorney fees to the Leemreises.
I. FACTS
In April or May of 2003, the Leemreises applied to the Sherman Township Planning Commission for approval of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- B P 7 v. Bureau of State LotteryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- McGill v. Auto Ass'n of MichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Department of Social Services v. Emmanuel Baptist PreschoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Duane Lockwood v. Township of EllingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Speicher v. Columbia Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Duane Lockwood v. Township of EllingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.