Goetz v. Roberts
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, P. J.
Appellant contested his wife’s will, which named her son by a former marriage executor and sole beneficiary, on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The jury found in favor of the proponent of the will on the first ground; the trial judge granted a nonsuit on the issue of undue influence. So far as the judgment is based on the verdict, appellant contends that the evidence does not support the verdict and that the judge committed prejudicial misconduct. As to the nonsuit, he contends that substantial evidence had been presented in support of the contest.
The Parties…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Paskvan v. MesichAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Estate of MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Estate of SarabiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Andersen v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Estate of EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.