Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 2011No. B221077PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*725Opinion

SUZUKAWA, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs and respondents Stephen Andersen (Stephen) and Kathleen Brandt (Kathleen) are the children of decedent Wayne Andersen (Wayne), who died April 28, 2006.1 Plaintiff John Andersen (John), not a party to this appeal, is Stephen’s son and Wayne’s grandson. Appellant Pauline Hunt (Pauline) was Wayne’s long-term romantic partner. Taylor Profita (Taylor) is Pauline’s grandson.

In 1992, Wayne and his wife established a family trust that named Stephen and Kathleen the sole beneficiaries after their parents’ deaths. Wayne’s wife died in 1993. In 2003, after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Estate of LingenfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Silverbrand v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Algo-Heyres v. Oxnard ManorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Andersen v. Profita CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Christie v. Kimball CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Doolittle v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API