Legal Opinion

Lechner v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1995No. 94-AB-2215; CA A86251Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board, contending that EAB erred in denying him unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). We write only to address claimant’s third assignment of error, that EAB erred in its interpretation of OAR 471-30-038(5)(d), and affirm.

Claimant began working in the parts department of employer, Southwestern Motors, Inc., in July 1993. He was paid $7.50 per hour. Although he was soon promoted to parts department manager, his wage remained unchanged until March 1994,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Martin v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API