Legal Opinion
DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about August 28, 2000, which granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny in full defendants’ motion with respect to plaintiffs second and third causes of action, and to reinstate those causes to the extent that they were dismissed, and to grant defendants’ motion insofar as to dismiss plaintiffs fourth cause of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs first cause of action for breach of written warranty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hornberger v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Stuart Becker & Co., P. C. v. Steven Kessler Motor Cars, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shuldman v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Beyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Harrison v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024