Legal Opinion

Shuldman v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of written and implied warranties pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (15 USC § 2301 et seq.), the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated December 12, 2002, as granted those branches of the defendants’ *344motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action in the complaint based on the remedy of revocation of acceptance and the claims for incidental damages, and the defendants cross-appeal from stated portions of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Ventura v. Ford Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Gochey v. Bombardier, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Novosel v. Northway Motor Car Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Diaz v. Paragon Motors of Woodside, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  3. Bardsley v. Nonni's Foods LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. Bollom v. Brunswick CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  5. Carney v. Boston MarketDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API