Legal Opinion
Stuart Becker & Co., P. C. v. Steven Kessler Motor Cars, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Norman C. Ryp, J.
a. issues:(1) Whether the doctrine of privity bars recovery by an automobile’s lessee of economic losses under the manufacturers’ implied warranty?(2) Whether the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act protects a corporate lessee, with an option to purchase, with a mixed personal-corporate use?
Two issues of first impression in the First Department.
Plaintiff, Stuart Becker & Co. (Becker), moves pursuant to CPLR 3215 to enter a judgment on default as against defendant, Tilden of New Jersey, Inc. (Tilden), on the grounds that Tilden defaulted in appearance and pleading.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Randy Knitwear, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Gray v. B. R. Trucking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carbo Industries, Inc. v. Becker Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- WESTPORT MARINA, INC. v. BoulayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Beyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2000