Legal Opinion

Arthur Jaffee Associates v. Bilsco Auto Service, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1983PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

*995The Appellate Division properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion papers presented no question of fact for trial sufficient to negate the validity and binding effect of the disclaimer of warranty coverage. In addition, on the facts of this case, there being no privity between the purchaser and the defendant there can be no implied warranty.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. County of Chenango Industrial Development Agency v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API