Legal Opinion
United States v. Jude Somerset Hardesty
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1992No. 90-30260PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Per curiam
Hardesty appeals from the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and former Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a). He was convicted in federal district court for possession of a sawed-off shotgun in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d), 5871 and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The district court ordered that Hardesty’s sentence run consecutively to a state prison sentence that he was serving at the time of his federal conviction.
Hardesty filed a motion to correct the sentence. He argued before the district court that the consecutive sentence was illegal…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Robin F. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Frank J. MaybusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Vasquez v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation, United States Ex Rel. Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.