Legal Opinion
Katcher v. Ohsman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 11, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 N.J. Super. 28 (1953)
97 A.2d 180
HENRY E. KATCHER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EDWARD OHSMAN, HERMAN FRIEDLANDER AND CROWN FUR DYEING & DRESSING CORP., A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided May 11, 1953.
Mr. Harry Krieger, attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Meyer Pesin, attorney for defendants.
STEIN, J.S.C.
Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to restrain the individual defendants Ohsman and Friedlander from conducting a special meeting of directors of the corporate defendant, Crown Fur Dyeing & Dressing Corp., the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bator v. United Sausage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Trefethen v. AmazeenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Nickolopoulos v. SarantisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- Franklin Trust Co. v. Rutherford, Boiling Springs & Carlstadt Electric Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olincy v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Piechowski v. MatareseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959