Legal Opinion
Piechowski v. Matarese
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 2, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 333 (1959)
148 A.2d 872
WILLIAM J. PIECHOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK R. MATARESE, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 15, 1958.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.
Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).
Mr. Burton Peskin argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Alexander Denbo, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Melone v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- Eilen v. Tappin's, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Ocean Cape Hotel Corp. v. Masefield Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Dover Shopping Center, Inc. v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Hindle v. Morrison Steel Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Blair v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.