Hobson Const. Co., Inc. v. Hajoca Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
By its first assignment of error plaintiff argues that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to it, and giving to it the benefit of all reasonable inferences and resolving all inconsistencies in its favor, was sufficient to show its right to relief. It contends that the court erred in granting defendant’s motion for dismissal under Rule 41(b). The assignment is without merit.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41 (b) states:
“After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of his evi dence, the defendant, without waiving his right to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Bryant v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Fearing v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Illinois Stone Company, a Corporation v. Universal Engineering Corporation, a Corporation, and MacHinery Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Southeastern Adhesives Co. v. Funder America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Lindy Homes, Inc. v. Evans Supply Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Williams v. LilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.