Legal Opinion

Merchant v. . Lassiter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1944PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHILL, J.

A number of the exceptive assignments of error are not brought forward and discussed in the brief. They are deemed, to be abandoned. Rule 28, 221 N. C., 562. (See cases cited.)

The defendants insist that they are not common carriers and that the court’s charge thereon was erroneous. As to this the plaintiff alleges: “(3). That the defendants are common carriers and engaged in the hauling and transferring merchandise and other articles from place to place, both in the City of High Point, North Carolina, and to other parts of the State, and are licensed and permitted by the State of North…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Meredith v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Peeler v. . PeelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Stein v. . LevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Gibson v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API