Legal Opinion

Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATED

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1973No. 733SC759PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

No reason or argument has been stated and no authority has been cited in appellant’s brief in support of appellant’s first four assignments of error. Accordingly, these will be taken as abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals.

At the close of the evidence the attorney for defendant moved under Rule 50 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for a “directed verdict dismissing the plaintiffs’ case.” Denial of this motion is the subject of appellant’s fifth assignment of error. Directed verdicts are appropriate only in jury cases. Bryant v. Kelly, 279 N.C. 123, 181…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Zelios v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Miles v. Carolina Forest Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Matter of SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API