Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Company v. Harvey Harms, Ed Walton v. Industrial Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1994No. 93-2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Industrial Indemnity Company appeals from an order of the district court 1 granting motions of Harvey Harms and Ed Walton to set aside judgments entered against them. The district court had ruled that Harms and Walton 2 had not given authority to waive service of process to a law firm retained to represent a group of farmers, which included Harms and Walton. Industrial Indemnity argues that the law firm had such authority, and by filing pleadings on behalf of Harms and Walton, waived the inadequacy of service of process. We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall, Secretary of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Massey v. Emergency Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Continental Shippers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Montague v. HeaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Gilbert LundstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Semler v. KlangDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. Guinness Import Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  4. Edwards v. Eastman Outdoors, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
  5. Eric Gray, et al. v. David Rice, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API