Legal Opinion
Pueblo of Santa Rosa v. Fall, Secretary of the Interior
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1927No. 511PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
Our order granting, the writ of certiorari in this case directed a hearing on the issue as to the existence of authority of counsel who filed the bill to represent complainant. ' That hearing now has been had.
The suit is brought to enjoin respondents from offering,, listing or disposing of certain lands in Arizona as public lands of the United States. The case was here before on appeal, Lane v. Pueblo of Santa Rosa, 249 U. S. 110, and was remanded to the District supreme court with directions to overrule a motion to dismiss on the merits and allow defendants to answer the bill. After receipt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lane v. Pueblo of Santa RosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Green v. Menominee TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- San Francisco Savings Union v. E. B. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Maiz v. ViraniCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Alamo v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.