Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Russell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland Comity; before Clinton F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Bureord, C. J.:

This cause presents the sole question as to whether the act extending the jurisdiction of the probate-court in civil and criminal matters, prescribing the pro- eedure therein and providing for appeals therefrom, enacted by the first legislature, repeals section 14, article 12, chapter 19, statutes 1890, on the subject of appeals.

The plaintiff in error, Carpenter, is a -creditor of the estate of John T. Russell, deceased. The defendant in error is the administratrix of said estate. The settlement of the estate is pending in the probate court of Cleveland,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Bernier v. BernierSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Kuchler v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Greenbush Cemetery Ass'n v. Van NattaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Shriver v. GrahamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API