Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Stevens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1945No. 34,071Published

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This case comes before us upon a motion by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal, which is from an order granting a motion for a new trial made before the entry of judgment in the cause. As authority for the appealability of the order, the defendant cites Ayer v. C. M. St. P. & P. R. Co. 189 Minn. 359, 249 N. W. 581; Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Ry. Co. 195 Minn. 537, 263 N. W. 616, 265 N. W. 303, 821; Vasatka v. Matsch, 216 Minn. 530, 13 N. W. (2d) 483. In all these cases, the motion for new trial was made after judgment, and the order granting it was held to be appealable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Spicer v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Vasatka v. MatschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Kruchowski v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Satanta State Bank v. O. B. McClintock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API