Legal Opinion

Ball v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1962No. Civ. 19760PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

We must determine here whether or not respondent insurance company incurred liability for coverage for bodily injuries inflicted upon appellants by the operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. Effective as of September 18, 1959, the relevant statute required that no policy be issued or delivered without such coverage. The instant policy, which was issued and delivered on December 19, 1958, provided that any of its terms in conflict with statute be amended to conform to such legislation. We have concluded that, since the policy had been issued and delivered prior to the enactment of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Anderson v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Pendleton v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bloom v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Ahern v. DillenbackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Langley v. Home Indemnity CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  5. Voris v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API