Legal Opinion

Pendleton v. Ferguson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1940No. L. A. 16184PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

By this action plaintiff sought to quiet his title as against the defendants to five certain letters patent issued to plaintiff by the government of the United States and particularly described in the complaint.. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff granting the relief prayed for against all of the defendants. This appeal is prosecuted by defendants Ferguson and Automatic Deep Well Pump Company, who claim an interest in three of said letters patent based upon an agreement entered into between plaintiff and defendant Ferguson on May 15, 1924, which agreement was assigned to defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  4. Republic Pictures Corp. v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
  5. Shutes v. CheneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API