Legal Opinion

Staten v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1996No. A071307PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we apply Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d 696] to the sport of figure skating. We conclude that being cut by the blade of another skater during a group skating session is an inherent risk of the sport. The injured skater cannot recover for personal injuries under the doctrine of primary assumption of risk.

Petitioners are the various defendants in a personal injury action brought by real party in interest, plaintiff Marie Bafus, who was cut on the arm when she collided with another figure skater, petitioner Mary Staten. Petitioners…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ballard v. UribeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ford v. GouinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cheong v. AntablinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Distefano v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Summers v. A. L. Gilbert Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API