Legal Opinion

Whalen v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 24, 2010No. 07-707CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This Pair Labor Standards Act ease involves Air Traffic Control Specialists (“ATCSs”) employed by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) at the High Desert Terminal Radar Approach Control (“TRA-CON”), Edwards Air Force Base, California (“Edwards AFB”). Plaintiffs seek damages in the form of compensation for overtime labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (the “Act” or “FLSA”).

Previously, the court addressed procedural issues in the case by (1) granting a motion by the government for dismissal of this action as to…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API