Whalen v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This Pair Labor Standards Act ease involves Air Traffic Control Specialists (“ATCSs”) employed by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) at the High Desert Terminal Radar Approach Control (“TRA-CON”), Edwards Air Force Base, California (“Edwards AFB”). Plaintiffs seek damages in the form of compensation for overtime labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (the “Act” or “FLSA”).
Previously, the court addressed procedural issues in the case by (1) granting a motion by the government for dismissal of this action as to…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.