Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Haynes
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action to enforce the liability of the defendants as stockholders of Manhattan Securities Company, an Arizona corporation. The liability asserted arose out of the alleged failure of Manhattan Securities Company to com ply with a contract, whereby it had agreed to purchase certain shares of the capital stock of the plaintiff.
The court entered judgment against the respective defendants, each of whom appeals from said judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The appellants claim that the agreement between the two corporations, Provident Gold Mining Company and Manhattan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. MatthiessenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Marsters v. LashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greb v. Diamond International Corp.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Commonwealth Acceptance Corp. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Boteler v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Armer v. DortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. MostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.