Legal Opinion

Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Most

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1940No. Civ. No. 6393PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEARY, J., pro tem.

On May 28, 1936, the plaintiff and hereinafter designated respondent, a Connecticut corporation, filed an action against appellant and numerous co-defendants to foreclose its mortgage upon certain real property in Los Angeles County. The complaint alleged that on or about June 18, 1928, the defendants I. Most and Sophie Most, his wife, and B. Chazan and Pearl Chazan, husband and wife, executed and delivered to plaintiff their promissory-note for $25,000, payable five years after date, interest at 5 per cent, payable semiannually, and at the same time, and as security…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Marsters v. LashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. In re SilkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Motor Investment Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Dollar Stores, Ltd. v. WagnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Armer v. DortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Conley v. LieberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Christopher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Christopher v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API