Legal Opinion
Mager v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 1985No. 49431PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
Plaintiff petitioned the trial court to declare that Ordinance No. 14.20.190 of the City of St. Louis, which prohibits liquor licensees from employing convicted felons, is void because it is in conflict with § 561.-016 RSMo.1978 1 and with Article I, § 2 of the Constitution of the State of Missouri. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s petition and he appeals from that judgment. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Lohr Distributing Co., Inc., a liquor distributor licensed pursuant to Title 14 of the Revised Code of the City of St. Louis, 1980, employed Mr. Mager.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schweig v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Passler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Crackerneck Country Club, Inc. v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Missouri Alliance for Retired Americans v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Levinson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Gates v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hardy v. City of BerkeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hardy v. Fire Standards Commission of St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.