Passler v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
The trial court permanently enjoined appellants, Kansas City and its director of liquor control, hereinafter called defendants, from enforcing certain subsections of Kansas City’s liquor control ordinance for the stated reason that the city “exceeded 'its powers under the statutes, Constitution, and the Charter * * *, in enacting Chapter 25, Subsection 15(b), (c) and (e) * *
Respondent, hereinafter called plaintiff, in this class action purports to represent himself and the class consisting of all licensed retail liquor dealers in Kansas City.
Kansas City’s liquor ordinance…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Kansas City v. LiebiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Star Square Auto Supply Co. v. GerkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Vest v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Readey v. St. Louis County Water CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Kopper Kettle Restaurants, Inc. v. City of St. RobertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Walker v. City of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- In Re JacobsmeyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.