Legal Opinion
United States v. Martin J. Cote Patricia S. Caldwell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 2, 1995No. 93-30441PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
The United States appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to set for retrial the cases of Patricia Caldwell and Martin Cote (collectively, the “defendants”), whose criminal convictions were reversed by decisions of this court. The district court concluded it lacked the authority to retry the defendants because the respective decisions and mandates directing the reversal of the defendants’ convictions omitted an explicit order remanding the cases. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
The defendants were charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Harriet M. Gould, an Unremarried Widow v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Donald Stacy v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Daniel F. KellingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America, Ex rel.linda A. Lujan v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hydrick v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.