Legal Opinion
Hydrick v. McDaniel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 2007No. 03-56712PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge TROTT.
ORDER
The opinion in this case published at 466 F.3d 676 (9th Cir.2006), is withdrawn and replaced by the new opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order.
Chief Judge Schroeder and Judge Pre-gerson voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc. Judge Trott voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Samantha Vazquez v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Fogel v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Seaton v. MaybergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.