Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 19, 2007No. S06G1139PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, 277 Ga. App. 722 (627 SE2d 431) (2006), to determine whether that court properly applied induced error in its analysis of appellants’ claim of substantial error in the jury charge. See OCGA § 5-5-24 (c). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
Appellants Cody Pearson and his parents, Tamara and Andrew Pearson, filed a civil action against appellee Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc. and 16-year-old Ashton Ballesteros seeking damages for personal injuries Cody received in a shooting accident. Cody was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moody v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Gray v. EliasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bailey v. Annistown Road Baptist Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- MAYNARD v. SNAPCHAT, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- John Zambetti v. Cheeley Investments, L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Lawyers Title Insurance v. New Freedom Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Delson v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.