Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 12, 2006No. A05A1581PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

This products liability action arises from the accidental shooting of Cody Pearson in the eye at short range with a loaded paintball gun manufactured by Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc. Cody and his parents in their individual capacities and as his guardian sued Tippmann for negligence and strict liability. At the conclusion of trial, the jury returned a special verdict finding Tippmann negligent, but further finding that Tippmann’s negligence was not the proximate cause of Cody’s injury. Appealing from the judgment entered on the jury verdict, plaintiffs contend that the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Union Camp Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Moody v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Birge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Pearson v. Tippmann Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API