Legal Opinion
State v. Warsop
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1997No. 18106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARMIJO, Judge.
1. Defendant was convicted of retaliating against a witness in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-24-3(B) (1991) (prior to 1997 amendment). On appeal, he claims: (1) the evidence was not sufficient to support the element of intent required to sustain his conviction for retaliating against a witness; (2) the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the lesser-included offense of “attempted retaliation against a witness”; (3) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of the name and nature of the prior felony offense that the victim had witnessed; (4) the trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. ManusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy MaggittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- State v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sandel v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- New Mexico Department of Labor v. A.C. Electric, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. McGeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.