Legal Opinion
State v. Woodward
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1995No. 20477PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROST, Justice.
1.Defendant David Marshall Woodward (David) appeals his convictions on charges of first-degree murder, aggravated burglary, and battery. David raises numerous issues regarding evidentiary rulings, sufficiency of the evidence, denial of mistrial, and cumulative error, which he contends mandate a reversal or new trial. We find no merit to any of David’s arguments and affirm.
I. FACTS
2. Viewed “in the light most favorable to supporting the verdict,” State v. Hernandez, 115 N.M. 6, 26, 846 P.2d 312, 332 (1993), the evidence adduced at trial is as follows. On the morning of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MoraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.