Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Co. v. City & County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1989No. 13286PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*481OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

In this case, the majority of this court filed an order affirming the decision of the circuit court on May 17,1989. The basis of the affirmance is the following opinion.

I

Bishop Estate is the fee owner of a tract of land divided into two segments, which are designated as Golf Course 5 and Golf Course 6, in the Kalama Valley area in East Honolulu. Kaiser Hawaii Kai Development Company (Kaiser) has the legal right to possess and develop this land. This land has been zoned for residential use since 1954. A portion of the land falls within the Shoreline…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Leonard v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Save Sunset Beach Coalition v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. FerreiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API