Legal Opinion

Save Sunset Beach Coalition v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2003No. 21332PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that in connection with the complaint filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants Save Sunset Beach Coalition, Life of the Land, 1 Larry McElheny, Benjamin Hopkins, and Peter Cole (Plaintiffs), the first circuit court (the court) correctly applied the propositions stated below except for the last two; the effect of such error, however, was harmless.

First, the rezoning 2 by Defendant-Appel-lee City and County of Honolulu (the City) of 765 acres of land located on the North Shore of O‘ahu and designated for “agricultural use” 3 to a “country district” designation 4…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Davis v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lanai Co., Inc. v. Land Use Com'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ueoka v. SzymanskiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kelly v. 1250 Oceanside PartnersHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. County of Hawai'i v. Ala Loop HomeownersHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API