Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-0800PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

Granting in Part and Denying in Part Dependant’s Motion to Dismiss; Denying the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

I. INTRODUCTION

In the course óf her work at Symantec Corporation, Lori Morsell came to believe that, her employer had violated certain contractual obligations to the United States. She subsequently filed this qui tam action as Relator against Symantec under the False Claims Act. The United States, California, and Florida intervened, and Relator elected to assert claims on behalf of New York. All…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. United States v. Dyncorp International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. United States ex rel. Riedel v. Bos. Heart Diagnostics Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. United States Ex Rel. Scott v. Pacific Architects & Engineers, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API