Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1988No. 00218 PGH 87PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the order below sustaining a demurrer and entering judgment in favor of appellees in a legal malpractice action. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in concluding that their cause of action is barred by this Court’s prior decision in Muhammad v. Children’s Hosp. of Pittsburgh, 337 Pa.Superior Ct. 635, 487 A.2d 443 (1984). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the order below and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The relevant procedural history, as summarized by the trial court, is as follows:

This matter is before the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Freezer Storage, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McPeake v. Cannon, Esquire, PCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Banker v. Valley Forge InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Kaller's Inc. v. John J. Spencer Roofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. McCullough v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Harter v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API